JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)July 15, 2005

T-756 de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Alba Julia Catuche De Ortega Vs. Iss Y Otro

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Inaplicacion De Normas Del Plan Obligatorio De Salud
  • Requisitos que deben cumplir pacientes con enfermedades catastróficas
Derecho A La Salud
  • No se cumplió el requisito de la incapacidad económica para cubrir tratamiento médico
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Derecho a la vida la salud y la seguridad social de afiliada cotizante a quien le fue diagnosticada estiopenia y su medico tratante le ordeno un examen y el medicamento no pos alendronato sodico que la entidad se niega a suministrar.

Solicita se ordene el suministro del medicamento formulado.

Requisitos para ordenar servicios medicos o medicamentos no incluidos en el pos.

No encontrándose probado el requisito de la incapacidad economica se hace innecesario estudiar el ultimo de los requisitos jurisprudenciales exigidos para ordenar la entrega de medicamentos no pos.

Negada

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR el fallo proferido el 18 de enero de 2005 por el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Popayán, en el proceso de acción de tutela de Alba Julia Catuche de Ortega contra el Instituto de Seguros Sociales, por los motivos expuestos en esta providencia.
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaría General líbrense las comunicaciones previstas en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.