JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)June 22, 2000

T-741 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Jhonson Ivan Almeida Medina

✓
Topic · hard data
Debido Proceso. Violacion Del Principio No Reformatio In Pejus. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Principio No Reformatio In Pejus
  • Competencia restringida del juez de segunda instancia
  • Alcance
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. Revocar la sentencia de fecha nueve (9) de marzo del año dos mil (2000) de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala de Casación Laboral, en la acción de tutela interpuesta por Jhonson Iván Almeida Muriel contra la providencia del Tribunal Superior de Santa Rosa de Viterbo, Sala de Decisión Penal, de fecha 24 de septiembre de 1999.
  2. Ordenar que dentro de las cuarenta y ocho (48) horas siguientes a la notificación de esta sentencia, el Tribunal Superior de Santa Rosa de Viterbo, Sala de Decisión Penal, profiera una nueva sentencia en la que, bajo ninguna circunstancia, puede establecerse una pena mayor a la impuesta por el juez de primer grado. Lo que no obsta para que el Tribunal, a su vez, si existe fundamento legal para ello, pueda disminuirla.
  3. Segundo. Por Secretaría General líbrense las comunicaciones previstas en el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.