JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 5, 2002

T-723 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Alfredo Aleman Ballen Vs. Famisanar Ltda

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos A La Salud Vida Dignidad Y Minimo Vital. Nucleo Esencial. Suministro Chaleco Ortopedico Ordenado Por Medico Tratante No Incluido En El Pos. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Salud
  • Fundamental por conexidad
  • Conexidad con la vida
  • Persona de escasos recursos
1 topic · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. INAPLICAR el Decreto 806 de 1998, artículo 10 y la Resolución 5261 de 1994 expedida por el Ministerio de Salud, artículo 18, para el caso concreto y aplicar la Constitución.
  2. SEGUNDO. REVOCAR el fallo del Juzgado 41 Civil Municipal de fecha 11 de junio de 2002 y en su lugar CONCEDER la tutela impetrada por las razones expuestas en las consideraciones de este fallo.
  3. TERCERO. ORDENAR a la E.P.S. FAMISANAR LTDA., que en el término de 48 horas, contadas a partir de la notificación de esta providencia, le entregue, si no lo ha hecho ya, el chaleco ortopédico TLSO ordenado por el médico tratante.
  4. CUARTO. LÍBRENSE por el Juzgado de instancia las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos allí contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.