JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 8, 2002

T-624 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Juan Antonio Macias Fontalvo Vs. Corte Suprema De Justicia

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Debido Proceso E Igualdad. Via De Hecho. Prescripcion Obligacion Pago De Honorarios Convenidos. Contrato De Prestacion De Servicios Profesionales. Revocatoria De Poder No Pactada. Foncolpuertos. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Revocación intempestiva de poder por Foncolpuertos y consecuencias patrimoniales
  • Regulación de honorarios
Foncolpuertos
  • Revocación intempestiva de poder
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR, por las consideraciones expuestas en la parte motiva de esta providencia, las sentencias proferidas por las Salas Civiles del H. Tribunal Superior de Bogota y de la H. Corte Suprema de Justicia el 5 de julio y el 22 de agosto del ano 2001 respectivamente, dentro de la accion de tutela instaurada por el senor Juan Antonio Macias Fontalvo contra la Sala Laboral de la H. Corte Suprema de Justicia.
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaria librense las comunicaciones previstas en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.