JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 5, 2002

T-611 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Andres Jose Villa Polo Vs. Codensa S.A.

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Debido Proceso. Suspension Servicio Publico De Energia Por Mora En El Pago. Cancelacion Definitiva Del Contrato. Posicion Dominante. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra Empresa De Servicios Publicos Domiciliarios
  • Improcedencia por suspensión del servicio de energía conociendo desde un principio la deuda que el actor tenía
  • Procedencia en situaciones especiales para dirimir conflictos con usuarios
Empresa De Servicios Publicos Domiciliarios
  • Suspensión del servicio y consecuencias cuando el usuario se atrasa en pago de tres facturas
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR la sentencia de fecha once (11) de marzo de dos mil dos (2002), proferida por la Sala Penal del Tribunal Superior de Bogotá, dentro de la acción de tutela interpuesta por el señor Andrés José Villa Polo, en contra de la empresa de energía Codensa S.A.
  2. Segundo. LÍBRENSE, por al Secretaría General de la Corte, las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991, en la forma y para los efectos allí contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.