JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)May 31, 2001

T-564 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Noe De Jesus Mejia Cano Vs.Iss Tulua.

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Vida Salud E Integridad Fisica. No Se Realiza Tratamiento Aduciendo Falta De Semanas De Cotizacion. Fallecimiento De La Persona Durante El Tramite De Revision Del Proceso. Carencia Actual De Objeto. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Sentencia De Revision De Tutela
  • Fallecimiento del enfermo
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (6 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E
  3. Primero. CONFIRMAR, por sustracción de materia, la decisión de única instancia proferida por el Juzgado
  4. Primero. Penal del Circuito de Tuluá, Valle, mediante la cual ese despacho decidió no tutelar el derecho fundamental a la salud de la señora Mariela Hernández Campiño, representada por el señor Noé de Jesús Mejía Cano.
  5. Segundo. PREVENIR a la Clínica Rafael Uribe Uribe para que, en lo sucesivo y conforme a las consideraciones de esta Sentencia, se abstenga de incurrir en las conductas descritas en esta providencia.
  6. Tercero. Por Secretaría General, LÍBRESE la comunicación prevista por el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.