JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)July 29, 1992

T-475 de 1992

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz

✓Claimant Jaime Fajardo

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Trabajo. Derecho A Escoger Oficio. Libertad De Empresa. Otorgamiento De Licencia Para Instalacion De Billares. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. R E S U E L V E
  2. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR la sentencia del 10 de febrero de 1992, proferida por el Juzgado Laboral del Circuito de Popayán, por la cual se concedió la tutela solicitada.
  3. SEGUNDO. ADICIONAR la mencionada sentencia en el sentido de tutelar transitoriamente, hasta el pronunciamiento definitivo de la Justicia Contencioso Administrativa, los derechos fundamentales al libre desarrollo de la personalidad y a la libertad de escoger profesión u oficio del señor JAIME FELIPE FAJARDO.
  4. TERCERO. LIBRESE comunicación al Juzgado Laboral del Circuito de Popayán, con miras a que se surta la notificación de esta providencia, según lo establecido en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJosé Gregorio Hernández Galindo
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.