JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 18, 1995

T-467 de 1995

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa

✓Claimant Jaime Bayona Benitez

✓
Topic · hard data
Debido Proceso Administrativo. Restitucion De Vehiculo Venezolano Retenido Por La Sijin. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Debido Proceso Administrativo
  • Campo de aplicación
  • Permanencia de vehículo
Derecho De Peticion
  • Proceso administrativo
Presuncion De Inocencia
  • Trámite administrativo
5 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REVOCAR el fallo de fecha 22 de mayo de 1995, proferido por el Juzgado Laboral del Circuito de Arauca y en su lugar NEGAR la acción de tutela interpuesta por el señor Jaime Bayona Benítez.
  2. SEGUNDO. ORDENAR a la Dirección de Impuestos y Aduanas Nacionales, seccional Arauca, continuar con el proceso administrativo No. DA95950001, iniciado el 6 de enero de 1995, suspendido por la decisión del Juez de primera y única instancia.
  3. TERCERO. ORDENAR que por la Secretaría General de esta Corporación, se comunique esta providencia al Juzgado Laboral del Circuito de Arauca, en la forma y para los efectos previstos en el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.