JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 12, 1993

T-443 de 1993

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Dagoberto Valencia

✓
Topic · hard data
Debido Proceso. Derecho De Defensa. Procesos Policivos Penales. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

4 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (11 points)
  1. PRIMERO. Revocar la sentencia del Juzgado
  2. Octavo. Penal del Circuito de Armenia, por medio de la cual se revoco la sentencia del Juzgado
  3. Septimo. Penal Municipal.
  4. SEGUNDO. Confirmar los ordinales
  5. primero. y
  6. tercero. de la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado
  7. Septimo. Penal Municipal de Armenia que concedio la tutela solicitada por Dagoberto Valencia Osorio, de su derecho fundamental al debido proceso, vulnerado por la Alcaldia Municipal de Armenia, y revocar el ordinal
  8. segundo. de dicha sentencia dado que no procede la indemnizacion ordenada con fundamento en el art. 25 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
  9. TERCERO. Revocar la adicion hecha a la sentencia por el Juzgado
  10. Septimo. Penal Municipal de Armenia, mediante providencia del 29 de marzo de 1993.
  11. CUARTO. Librense por Secretaria General las comunicaciones de que trata el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991, para que notifique la presente providencia y adecue su fallo a lo dispuesto por esta sentencia en su parte considerativa.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.