JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 25, 1998

T-441 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Maria Elsy Guzman

✓
Topic · hard data
Debido Proceso. Revocatoria De Acto Administrativo. Restablecimiento Del Der. Pensional. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Debido Proceso Administrativo
  • Revocación unilateral de acto que reconoce situación particular y concreta
Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Revocación de acto que reconoce situación particular y concreta
Revocacion Directa De Acto Administrativo Particular Y Concreto
  • Consentimiento expreso y escrito del titular
Sustitución Pensional
  • Revocación sin consentimiento expreso y escrito del titular
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado
  2. Noveno. Laboral del Circuito de Santafe de Bogota, el 9 de marzo de 1998, mediante la cual se nego la tutela impetrada.
  3. Segundo. ORDENAR al Instituto de los Seguros Sociales el restablecimiento del derecho a la sustitucion pensional de que venia disfrutando la actora, y el pago de las mesadas pensionales dejadas de devengar desde el momento en que le fue suspendido el referido derecho, con la correspondiente correccion monetaria.
  4. Tercero. LIBRENSE por la Secretaria General de esta Corporacion, las comunicaciones de que trata el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos alli contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.