JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 11, 1997

T-370 de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Milsa Evelisa Ramirez Palacios

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. De Peticion. Solicitud De Reconocimiento De Pension Gracia. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Peticion
  • Carácter excepcional de aplazamiento de respuesta
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCASE la providencia examinada.
  2. Segundo. CONCEDESE la tutela y, por tanto, ORDENASE a la Subdirección de Prestaciones Económicas de CAJANAL que resuelva de fondo e íntegramente sobre la petición de MILZA EVELISA RAMIREZ PALACIOS, en un término máximo de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas contadas a partir de la notificación de esta Sentencia.
  3. Tercero. ADVIERTESE a la Subdirección de Prestaciones Económicas de CAJANAL que no puede seguir violando en la forma en que lo viene haciendo el derecho fundamental de petición de quienes a ella acuden.
  4. Cuarto. COMPULSANSE copias al Procurador General de la Nación para las investigaciones correspondientes.
  5. Quinto. DESE cumplimiento a lo previsto en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.