JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)December 12, 2000

T-1744 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz

✓Claimant Alvaro Betancourt Velasquez Vs. Cajanal

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho De Peticion. Solicitud Reconocimiento De Pension Gracia. Respuesta En Formatos Preimpresos. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Peticion
  • No constituye respuesta información suministrada al juez de tutela
  • Resolución con formato preimpreso
Derecho De Petición
  • Alcance y contenido
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida el 6 de julio de 2000 por el Juzgado
  2. Septimo. Laboral del Circuito de Bogota. En su lugar, TUTELAR el derecho fundamental de peticion del senor Alvaro Betancourt Velasquez.
  3. Segundo. ORDENAR a la Caja Nacional de Prevision CAJANAL -Subdireccion de Prestaciones Economicas- que, a mas tardar dentro de las cuarenta y ocho (48) horas siguientes a la notificacion del presente fallo, si ya no lo hubiere hecho, resuelva de fondo, concreta y completamente, sobre la solicitud hace tiempo elevada por el actor.
  4. Tercero. Secretaria, librese la comunicacion de que trata el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos alli contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.