JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 1, 1993

T-361 de 1993

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz

✓Claimant Stella Gomez

✓
Topic · hard data
Proceso De Amparo Administrativo Minero. Titulo Minero. Medio De Defensa Judicial. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. R E S U E L V E
  2. PRIMERO. REVOCAR la sentencia de marzo 18 de 1993, proferida por el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Valledupar, Sala Civil.
  3. SEGUNDO. CONCEDER la tutela solicitada, por los motivos expuestos en esta sentencia y, en consecuencia, ORDENAR al Alcalde Municipal de la Jagua de Ibirico dar nuevamente trámite a la solicitud de amparo administrativo elevada por el CONSORCIO MINERO UNIDO S.A. a partir de la providencia admisoria de la acción, dentro de las 48 horas posteriores a la notificación de la presente providencia, de manera que sean respetados cabalmente los derechos fundamentales de defensa y debido proceso de las personas representadas por la peticionaria.
  4. TERCERO. LIBRESE comunicación al Juzgado Promiscuo del Circuito de Chiriguaná, con miras a que se surta la notificación de esta providencia, según lo establecido en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.