JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)July 27, 1994

T-342 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Ariel Uribe Orozco Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Ders. De Los Indigenas. Diversidad Etnica Y Cultural. Ders Culturales. Nukak-Maku. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REVOCAR la sentencia de agosto diecisiete (17) de mil novecientos noventa y tres (1993), proferida por la Sala Plena del Tribunal Administrativo del Meta, y en su lugar, TUTELAR los derechos a la libertad, libre desarrollo de la personalidad, de conciencia y culto, y principalmente los derechos culturales, que se estiman fundamentales, de la comunidad indigena "Nukak-Maku", amenazados por las actividades que realiza la "Asociacion Nuevas Tribus de Colombia".
  2. SEGUNDO. ENVIAR copia de esta sentencia al Ministerio de Gobierno -Division de Asuntos Indigenas-, a la Gobernacion del Departamento del Guaviare -Secretaria de Gobierno- y al Ministerio de Salud -Direccion Seccional de Salud-, para que en la forma senalada en la parte motiva y dentro de los limites de sus respectivas competencias, adopten las medidas que estimen conducentes.
  3. TERCERO. ORDENAR librar comunicacion al Tribunal Administrativo del Meta, para que de conformidad con lo dispuesto por el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991, notifique esta sentencia a las partes y adopte las decisiones necesarias para adecuar su fallo a lo dispuesto por esta Sala.
  4. Notifiquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.