JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)July 19, 1995

T-313 de 1995

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Esther Rodriguez Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Pension De Invalidez. Revisiones Medicas. Pensiones Extra-Legales En Colpuertos. Negada
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Colpuertos
  • Solidaridad en obligaciones laborales
Pension De Invalidez
  • Inexistencia de incapacidad
  • Fundamental
  • Revisiones médicas
4 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. REVOCAR la sentencia del Juez Quince Penal del Circuito de Barranquilla, proferida el 20 de enero de 1995, en el proceso de la referencia, y, en su lugar NO CONCEDER la tutela impetrada, teniendo en cuenta las razones expuestas en este fallo de revisión.
  2. SEGUNDO. Líbrense por Secretaría las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  3. TERCERO. Envíese copia de esta providencia al Defensor del Pueblo.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.