JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 16, 2000

T-294 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Maria Matilde Casas Camelo

✓
Topic · hard data
Falta De Legitimacion Por Activa En El Caso De Padres De Hijos Mayores De Edad. Solo Pueden Interponerla Si Hijos Se Encuentran Imposiblitados. Tutela Contra Brinks De Colombia Por Accidente. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Juez Constitucional
  • No asunción de competencias de otros funcionarios judiciales
Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Cubrimiento de gastos médicos proveniente de lesión corporal
Agencia Oficiosa En Tutela
  • Madre en representación de hijo mayor de edad
  • Necesidad de probar imposibilidad de accionar
Responsabilidad Civil Extracontractual
  • Determinación e indemnización
7 topics · 8 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMASE por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de esta sentencia, el fallo proferido en enero tres (3) del ano 2000, por el Juzgado Cuarenta y Ocho (48) Penal Municipal de Santafe de Bogota, dentro de la accion de tutela instaurada por la senora Maria Matilde Casas Camelo, en contra de la empresa Brinks de Colombia S.A.
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaria General, librense las comunicaciones de que trata el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.