JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)April 9, 2003

T-293 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Jorge Enrique Galvez Velasquez Vs. Juzgado 7 Civil Del Circuito De Cali Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Debido Proceso De Personas Juridicas. Via De Hecho. Surtir Tramite Demanda Respecto De Otros Demandados. Accion Revocatoria Concursal. Fideicomiso. Tutela Contra Providencias Judiciales. Prueba De Existencia Y Representacion. Sociedad Alianza S
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion Revocatoria Concursal
  • Debe darse trámite a la demanda
  • Rechazo de demanda
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida por la Sala de Casacion Laboral de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, el 10 de diciembre de 2002, y en su lugar CONFIRMAR el fallo proferido el 15 de noviembre de 2002, por la Sala de Casacion Civil y Agraria de la misma Corporacion.
  2. Segundo. Para los efectos dispuestos en esta providencia, PRESTESE por la parte demandante en el proceso de accion revocatoria concursal, la colaboracion necesaria, a fin de que se pueda dar tramite a la demanda.
  3. Librense por Secretaria, las comunicaciones de que trata el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  4. Notifiquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.