JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)April 5, 2002

T-238 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant David Fernando Garcia Gomez Vs. Tribunal Superior De Cartagena

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Debido Proceso. Solicitud Nulidad Decretada. Via De Hecho. Tutela Contra Providencias Judiciales. Conflicto De Competencia Entre Distintas Jurisdicciones. Ley 446 De 1998. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia Entre Jurisdicciones
  • Decisiones que profiere el Consejo Superior de la Judicatura no son obligatorias en otros asuntos
  • Conocimiento de procesos ejecutivos originados en condenas impuestas por la jurisdicción contencioso administrativa
Via De Hecho
  • Inexistencia por interpretación sobre un punto de derecho
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. CONFIRMAR por las razones expuestas en esta providencia, la sentencia proferida por el Consejo de Estado el 25 de enero de 2002, dentro de la accion de tutela interpuesta por David Fernando Garcia Gomez contra el Tribunal Superior de Cartagena, Sala Civil - Familia.
  2. Librense por Secretaria, las comunicaciones de que trata el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  3. Notifiquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.