JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)May 17, 1994

T-235 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Jesus Arley Escobar

✓
Topic · hard data
Legitimacion Por Pasiva. Suspension Del Servicio De Energia En Instituciones Carcelarias. Der A La Vida. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

6 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REVOCAR, la sentencia de noviembre veintiseis (26) de mil novecientos noventa y tres (1993), proferida por la Sala Penal del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Buga, y en su lugar, TUTELAR los derechos fundamentales a la vida e integridad personal del senor Jesus Arley Escobar Posada.
  2. SEGUNDO. PREVENIR al senor Gerente de la "Compania de Electricidad de Tulua S.A.", para que en ningun caso vuelva a incurrir en las acciones que dieron merito para conceder la presente accion de tutela, y que, si procediere de modo contrario, sera sancionado de acuerdo con lo previsto en el decreto 2591 de 1991.
  3. TERCERO. LIBRAR comunicacion al Juzgado
  4. Tercero. Penal del Circuito de Tulua, para que de conformidad con lo dispuesto por el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991, notifique esta sentencia a las partes y adopte las decisiones necesarias para adecuar su fallo a lo dispuesto por esta Sala.
  5. Notifiquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.