JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)April 14, 1994

T-181 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Celedonio Cobos Tequia

✓
Topic · hard data
Inscripcion En Carrera Administrativa. Beneficencia De C/Namarca. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REVOCAR parcialmente el fallo proferido por el Juzgado Quince Laboral de Santa Fe de Bogota, por las razones expuestas en esta sentencia.
  2. SEGUNDO. TUTELAR, el derecho de Celedonio Cobos Tequia a que se le tramite la solicitud para inscripcion en la Carrera Administrativa, dandosele la certificacion sobre el cumplimiento de condiciones y requisitos, si a ello hubiere lugar y teniendo en cuenta las consideraciones de esta sentencia.
  3. TERCERO. La Beneficencia de Cundinamarca, en el plazo improrrogable de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas dara cumplimiento a lo ordenado en el numeral anterior.
  4. CUARTO. El Juez de Tutela iniciara el incidente de desacato segun el articulo 52 del decreto 2591 de 1992 y el articulo 9o del Decreto 306 de 1992.
  5. QUINTO. COMUNICAR a traves de la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional el contenido de la sentencia al Juzgado Quince Laboral del Circuito de Santa Fe de Bogota, al Sindico -Gerente de la Beneficencia de Cundinamarca, al senor Celedonio Cobos Tequia y al Defensor del Pueblo.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.