JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 23, 1999

T-178 de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa

✓Claimant Maria Dorian Alvarez

✓
Topic · hard data
Concurso De Meritos. Lista De Elegibles. Nombramiento Del Primero. Cargo De Juez. Hecho Superado. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Hecho superado
Carrera Judicial
  • Igualdad de condiciones de funcionarios que conforman lista de candidatos
  • Inexistencia de distinciones entre lista de elegibles y lista de candidatos
  • Nombramiento de funcionarios y empleados que obtuvieron el primer puesto
  • Distinciones entre funcionarios y empleados para el ingreso
2 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E
  3. Primero. CONFIRMAR, por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de esta providencia, la Sentencia de única instancia proferida en el proceso de la referencia por el Tribunal Administrativo de Caldas el 9 de noviembre de 1998.
  4. Segundo. DESE cumplimiento a lo previsto en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
ConcurrenceAlfredo Beltrán Sierra
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.