JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)April 11, 1994

T-173 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Odilia Valderrama Vda De Ramirez

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Sustitucion Pensional. Prevalencia Del Derecho Sustancial. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

4 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado Treinta y Cinco Penal del Circuito de Santa Fe de Bogota el 4 de junio de 1993, y, consecuencialmente la sentencia del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Santa Fe de Bogota, que confirmo la anterior, de fecha 10 de diciembre de 1993.
  2. SEGUNDO. Conceder la tutela de derecho a la Pension de Sobrevivientes por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de esta sentencia y con las advertencias alli consignadas y conminar a JOAQUIN ROBERTO SOLANO SOLANO, propietario de la Hacienda La Conejera, para que en lo sucesivo se abstenga en incurrir en la omision de no cancelar la pension de sobrevivientes (antes sustitucion pensional) en favor de ODILIA VALDERRAMA VDA. DE RAMIREZ.
  3. TERCERO. COMUNICAR a traves de la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional el contenido de la sentencia al Juzgado 35 Penal del Circuito de Santa Fe de Bogota, a la Presidente del Instituto de Seguros Sociales, a la senora Odilia Valderrama Vda. de Ramirez, al senor Joaquin Roberto Solano Solano y al Defensor del Pueblo.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.