JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 14, 2000

T-1572 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz

✓Claimant Jaime Leonel Caro Vs. Iss

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Vida Salud E Integridad Fisica. Solicitud Cirugia Para Tratamiento De Cancer. Enfermedades Ruinosas O Catastroficas. Minimo De Semanas Cotizadas. Accion De Repeticion. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Enfermedades Catastroficas O Ruinosas
  • Tratamiento de quimioterapia por EPS
  • Suministro de tratamientos sin cumplir periodo mínimo de cotización
Entidad Promotora De Salud
  • Repetición contra el FOSYGA
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida por el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Santafe de Bogota D.C. de fecha 12 de junio de 2000.
  2. Segundo. CONCEDER la proteccion de los derechos a la vida en comunidad con el derecho a la salud del actor JAIME LEONEL CARO. En consecuencia, se ordena al ISS - Seccional Bogota que en el termino de 48 horas siguientes a la notificacion de esta providencia preste el tratamiento medico integral que requiera el actor, de acuerdo con la prescripcion de su medico tratante.
  3. Tercero. La EPS del ISS podra repetir en contra de la subcuenta de enfermedades catastroficas y ruinosas del Fondo de Solidaridad y Garantia del Sistema General de Seguridad Social en Salud.
  4. Cuarto. Por Secretaria general, librense las comunicaciones previstas en el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos alli contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.