JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)April 16, 1993

T-138 de 1993

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Daniel Guardo M.

✓
Topic · hard data
Reformatio In Pejus. Reintegro Facultad De Odontologia. Hechos Ocurridos Antes De Const. Del 91. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

4 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. Confirmar la sentencia de fecha diez (10) de Noviembre de mil novecientos noventa y dos (1.992), proferida por el Consejo de Estado dentro del presente negocio, en virtud de las razones señaladas en la presente decisión.
  2. SEGUNDO. Ordenar que por la Secretaría General se libren las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1.991, para los fines allí contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.