JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)June 23, 1995

T-272 de 1995

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Manuel Cabrales Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Tutela Contra Particulares. Vigencia De La Tutela. Prueba Del Estado Civil. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

5 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REVOCAR los numerales 1º, 2º y 3º del fallo proferido por el Juez Civil del Circuito de Ocaña, el 3 de febrero de 1995, dentro de la acción de tutela instaurada por Manuel José Cabrales Aycardi y Federico Cabrales Aycardi. Queda sin efecto lo determinado en tal sentencia.
  2. SEGUNDO. Se declara improcedente la presente acción de tutela.
  3. TERCERO. Comuníquese, de inmediato, esta decisión a la Registraduría Especial del Estado Civil de Ocaña y a la Curia Diocesana de tal ciudad. Remitiéndoseles copia íntegra de esta sentencia.
  4. CUARTO. Para efecto del cumplimiento de lo señalado en el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991, comuníquese al Juez de primera instancia, para que haga las notificaciones respectivas y tome las medidas del caso.
  5. QUINTO. Envíese copia de esta sentencia al Defensor del Pueblo.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.