JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 2, 2000

T-1330 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Diego Fernando Arboleda Jaramillo Vs. Ministerio De Educacion Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Educacion. Credito Educativo Condonable. Suministro De Recursos Necesarios Para Cursar Estudios Superiores. Icetex. Premio Linea Especial Mejores Bachilleres Mencion Andres Bello. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Icetex
  • Finalidad
Derecho A La Educacion De Estudiantes Sobresalientes
  • Vulneración por omisión del ICETEX en desembolso de dinero
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (10 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR las sentencias proferidas por el Consejo de Estado, Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativo, Seccion Cuarta, el 4 de febrero del 2000 y el Tribunal Administrativo de Antioquia, Sala Cuarta de Decision, el 4 de noviembre de 1999. En su lugar, CONCEDER la tutela impetrada por Diego Fernando Arboleda Jaramillo.
  2. Segundo. CONFIRMAR la sentencia proferida por la Sala de Familia del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Bogota, el 21 de febrero de 2000 dentro de la accion de tutela instaurada por Diego Fernando Arboleda Jaramillo contra el Ministerio de Educacion Nacional.
  3. Tercero. Por Secretaria librese la comunicacion prevista en el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
  4. ANTONIO BARRERA CARBONELL
  5. Magistrado Ponente
  6. ALFREDO BELTRAN SIERRA
  7. Magistrado
  8. MARTHA SACHICA DE MONCALEANO
  9. Magistrada
  10. IVAN ESCRUCERIA MAYOLO
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.