JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 30, 2003

T-1028 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Luis Eduardo Mosquera Aragon Vs. Concejo Municipal De San Juan De Arama Meta

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos A La Vida Integridad Y Debido Proceso. Exigencia Renuncia De Concejales Por Parte De Las Farc. Sesiones En Sede Oficial. Decretos Dictados En Estado De Conmocion Interior. Vigencia. Cosa Juzgada Constitucional. Tutela Contra Tutela. Ley 782 De 20
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Concejo Municipal
  • Debe sesionar en su sede oficial salvo alteración del orden público
  • Debe sesionar en su sede oficial por no presentarse en el caso alteración del orden publico
Cosa Juzgada En Materia De Tutela
  • No selección para revisión
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado 1º Promiscuo Municipal de San Juan de Arama, Meta, el 9 de mayo de 2003, y, en consecuencia, DENEGAR la tutela a los derechos a la vida y la integridad personal del señor Luis Eduardo Mosquera Aragón.
  2. SEGUNDO. Para los efectos del artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991, el juzgado de origen hará las notificaciones y tomará las medidas conducentes para el cumplimiento de esta sentencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.