JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)February 27, 1997

T-096 de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz

✓Claimant German Giraldo Giraldo

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. De Peticion. Empresas Publicas De Manizales. Desorganizacion En La Correspondencia De La Empresa. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Peticion
  • Desorganización correspondencia de empresa
  • Pronta resolución
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (7 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR el numeral
  2. primero. de la parte resolutiva de la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado
  3. Quinto. (5deg) Penal Municipal de Manizales, el veintisiete (27) de septiembre de mil novecientos noventa y seis (1996), y en su lugar CONCEDER la tutela al derecho de peticion del senor German Giraldo Giraldo. Por consiguiente, ORDENASE a las Empresas Publicas de Manizales, que en el termino de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas siguientes a la notificacion del presente fallo, proceda a resolver las peticiones presentadas por el accionante.
  4. Segundo. CONFIRMAR el numeral
  5. segundo. de la parte resolutiva de la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado
  6. Quinto. (5deg) Penal Municipal de Manizales, el veintisiete de septiembre de mil novecientos noventa y seis (1996).
  7. Tercero. LIBRENSE, por Secretaria, las comunicaciones de que trata el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991, en la forma y para los efectos alli contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.