JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)January 12, 2001

T-002 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Eduardo Montealegre Lynett

✓Claimant Javier Ospina Cocuy Vs. Fiscal 80 Unidad Ii Patrimonio Economico De Cali

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Defensa Y Debido Proceso. Solicitud Cancelacion Medidas Cautelares De Embargo Y Secuestro De Bienes. Falta De Legitimidad Para Actuar. Via De Hecho. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Apoderado Judicial
  • Representación de derechos ajenos
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida por el Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura del Valle del Cauca dentro de la acción de tutela instaurada por Javier Ospina Cocuy contra la Fiscal 80 de Unidad III de Patrimonio Económico de Cali, y en su lugar DENEGAR el amparo solicitado.
  2. SEGUNDO. Por Secretaría líbrese la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.