JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)November 6, 2002Full bench

C-949 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Agustin Velasco Velez

✓
Topic · hard data
Prohibicion A Servidor Publico.Inexequibilidad Del Incumplimiento Reiterado E Injustificado De Obligaciones Impuestas En Decisiones Administrativas
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Prohibicion A Servidor Publico
  • Inexequibilidad del incumplimiento reiterado e injustificado de obligaciones impuestas en decisiones administrativas
  • Determinación del fundamento del ilícito disciplinario
  • Incumplimiento reiterado e injustificado de obligaciones civiles, laborales, comerciales o de familia impuesta en decisión judicial
Prohibicion Disciplinaria A Servidor Publico
  • Incumplimiento reiterado e injustificado de obligaciones civiles, laborales, comerciales o de familia impuesta en decisión judicial
Congreso
  • Incorporación en ley de condición establecida por la Corte Constitucional
Falta Disciplinaria
  • Comportamientos que no la constituye
  • Exigencia de ilicitud sustancial
  • No la constituye comportamientos que no trascienden el ámbito funcional
5 topics · 9 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 734 de 2002.

Art. 35 num. 11.

Codigo disciplinario unico.

Prohibiciones a servidores publicos.

Incumplimiento reiterado e injustificado de obligaciones civiles laborales comerciales y de familia impuestas en decisiones judiciales o administrativas

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 734/00. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 35Ley 734/00 «Por la cual se expide el Codigo Disciplinario Unico»UPHELD
Art. 35Ley 734/02 «numeral 11»UPHELD
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el articulo 35, numeral 11, de la Ley 734 de 2000 "Por la cual se expide el Codigo Disciplinario Unico", salvo la expresion "o administrativas" que se declara INEXEQUIBLE.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available2
DissentRodrigo Escobar GilDissentJaime Córdoba Triviño
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.