JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)November 3, 1999Full bench

C-868 de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Juan Carlos Morales Trujillo

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 80/93 Art. 242930 Estatuto General De Contratacion Adtiva. No Hay Interpretacion Constitucional. Ineptitud Sustancial De La Demanda. Inexistencia De Cargos. Inhibida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 80/93. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 24Ley 80/93DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 29Ley 80/93DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 30Ley 80/93DECLINED TO RULE
3 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Declárase INHIBIDA para resolver de fondo acerca de la acción incoada, por ineptitud sustancial de la demanda.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.