JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)July 25, 2001Full bench

C-776 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Marcela Patricia Jimenez Arango

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La No Autoincriminacion En Libertad Provisional. Colaboración Necesaria Para Esclarecimiento De Hechos
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La No Autoincriminacion En Diligencia De Compromiso
  • Colaboración necesaria para esclarecimiento de hechos
Derecho A La No Autoincriminacion En Libertad Provisional
  • Colaboración necesaria para esclarecimiento de hechos
Deberes De La Persona Y Del Ciudadano
  • Colaboración para el buen funcionamiento de la administración de justicia
Presuncion De Inocencia
  • No imposición de colaboración necesaria para esclarecimiento de hechos
10 topics · 9 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 600 de 2000.

Codigo de procedimiento penal.

Art 368 (p).

Diligencia de compromiso prestarle la colaboracion necesaria para el esclarecimiento de los hechos.

Comparecencia del sindicado.

Silencio voluntario.

Autoincriminacion.

Inexequible

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 600/00. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 151Ley 600/00STRUCK DOWN
Art. 367Ley 600/00STRUCK DOWN· phrase
Phrase struck down«"y prestarle la colaboración necesaria para el esclarecimiento de los hechos" del numeral 1.»
Art. 368Ley 600/00STRUCK DOWN· phrase
3 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Declárase INEXEQUIBLE la expresión "y prestarle la colaboración necesaria para el esclarecimiento de los hechos" contenida en el artículo 368 numeral
  2. primero. de la ley 600 de 2000 "Por la cual se expide el Código de Procedimiento Penal".
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
ConcurrenceAlvaro Tafur Galvis
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.