C-740 de 2000
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz
✓Claimant Fredy Albeiro Ospina Perez
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Necesidad de nuevo pronunciamiento frente a modificación de artículo de la Constitución
- Confrontación con artículo modificado de la Constitución
- Improcedencia por delitos políticos
- Improcedencia por hechos cometidos antes del Acto Legislativo 01 de 1997
- Establecimiento marco por la Constitución
- Fuentes para solicitar, conceder u ofrecer
- Límites
- Aplicación en defecto
- Efectos derogatorios
- Sujeción a tratados públicos o en su defecto a la ley
- No restablece vigencia de disposiciones expulsadas del ordenamiento mediante sentencia
- Aplicación principal y preferencial
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Dec. 100/80.
Art. 17 parcial.
Extradicion.
Exequible e inexequible.
What it decided
Holdings on Decreto 100/80. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Declarar EXEQUIBLE la expresion "a falta de" del primer inciso del articulo 17 del Decreto 100 de 1980 e INEXEQUIBLE el
- segundo. inciso del articulo 17 del Decreto 100 de 1980 - Codigo Penal -.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.