C-600 de 2000
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Carlos Gaviria Díaz
✓Claimant Dario Garzon Garzon
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Argumento que versa sobre materia distinta a la consagrada por norma acusada
- Ausencia de concepto de vulneración
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Ley 228/95.
Art. 18 (p).
Captura en flagrancia.
Termino para poner el capturado a disposicion del funcionario.
Contravfenciones.
Sentencia inhibitoria.
What it decided
Holdings on Ley 228/95. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
- R E S U E L V E :
- Declararse INHIBIDA para conocer la demanda contra el numeral 1 del artículo 18 de la Ley 228 de 1995, por ineptitud de la demanda.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.