JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)October 2, 1998Full bench

C-597 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carlos Gaviria Díaz

✓Claimant Angela Janeth Galvis Ardila

✓
Topic · hard data
C.C. Art. 1742 Parcial Subrogado Por El Art. 2 De La Ley 50/36. Declaracion De La Nulidad Absoluta. Exequible.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 84/73. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 1742Ley 84/73 «y en todo caso por prescripción extraordinaria»UPHELD
Art. 1742Ley 57/87 «y en todo caso por prescripción extraordinaria.»UPHELD
3 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución.
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el aparte acusado del artículo 1742 del Código Civil, que dice..." y en todo caso por prescripción extraordinaria."
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.