JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)June 1, 2004Full bench

C-557 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓
Topic · hard data
Control De Constitucionalidad Al Convenio De Tampere Sobre Suministro De Recursos De Telecomunicaciones Para Mitigacion De Catastrofes Y Las Operaciones De Socorro En Casos De Catastrofe
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 847 de 2003.

Convenio de tampere sobre el suministro de recursos de telecomunicaciones para la mitigacion de catastrofes y las operaciones de socorro en casos de catastrofe.

Privilegios inmunidades y facilidades.

Solucion de controversias.

Negociacion

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 847/03. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. R E S U E L V E:
  3. PRIMERO. Declarar EXEQUIBLES las disposiciones del "CONVENIO DE TAMPERE SOBRE EL SUMINISTRO DE RECURSOS DE TELECOMUNICACIONES PARA LA MITIGACION DE CATASTROFES Y LAS OPERACIONES DE SOCORRO EN CASOS DE CATASTROFE", adoptado en Tampere, Finlandia, el dieciocho (18) de junio 1998.
  4. SEGUNDO. Declarar EXEQUIBLE la Ley 847 de 2003, por medio de la cual se aprueba dicho convenio.
  5. TERCERO. Enviar copia de esta sentencia al Presidente de la Republica y a la Ministra de Relaciones Exteriores para los efectos pertinentes a que alude el articulo 241, Num. 10, de la Constitucion Politica.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.