JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)September 28, 1995Full bench

C-431 de 1995

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Hernando Herrera Vergara

✓Claimant Luis Enrique Ladino Romero

✓
Topic · hard data
Dec. 2279/89. Art. 32. Ley 23/91. Art. 110. Dec. 2651/91. Art. 2 Inc. 2.. Medidas Cautelares En El Proceso Arbitral. Exequible. Estarse A Lo Resuelto En La <a Href=../1995/C-294-95.Rtf> C-294/95</A>.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Arbitro
  • Función jurisdiccional
  • Facultades
Funcion Constitucional
  • Expresamente determinada
Juez
  • Poderes
Medidas Cautelares
  • Facultades de los árbitros
  • Naturaleza
Arbitramento
  • Materia arbitral
  • Alcance
Proceso Ejecutivo
  • No susceptible de arbitramento
10 topics · 10 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 2279/89. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 32Decreto 2279/89UPHELD
Art. 110Ley 23/91UPHELD
Art. 2Decreto 2651/91ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
3 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Primero. Declarar exequibles los articulos 32 del Decreto 2279 de 1989 y 110 de la Ley 23 de 1991, por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de esta providencia.
  4. Segundo. Estese a lo resuelto en la sentencia No. C-294 de 1995, en relacion con la demanda contra el inciso 2o. del articulo 2o. del Decreto 2651 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available2
DissentEduardo Cifuentes MuñozConcurrenceAntonio Barrera Carbonell
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.