JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)August 22, 1996Full bench

C-385 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Hidelbrando Ortiz Lozano

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 5/92. Arts. 339 Inc. 2; 340 Parcial 341342 Y 343. Regalmento Del Congreso En Materia De Investigacion. Exequible. Ver <a Href=../1996/C-222-96.Rtf> C-222/96</A>. Inbitoria 343.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 5/92. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 339Ley 5/92 «inciso 2»UPHELD
Art. 340Ley 5/92 «de que se entienda que el traslado debe darse no sólo al defensor sino a los demás sujetos procesales»UPHELD· conditionally
Art. 341Ley 5/92 «"Acusación", declarada exequible mediante la sentencia C-222/96»UPHELD
Art. 342Ley 5/92UPHELD
Art. 343Ley 5/92DECLINED TO RULE
5 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. Declarar EXEQUIBLES las siguientes disposiciones de la Ley 5a. de 1992: el inciso 2, del articulo 339; los apartes acusados del art. 340, bajo la condicion de que se entienda que el traslado debe darse no solo al defensor sino a los demas sujetos procesales; el art. 341, salvo la expresion "Acusacion", declarada exequible mediante la sentencia C-222/96; el art. 342, en cuanto a la expresion "Recibido el proyecto de resolucion calificadora, la Comision de Investigacion y Acusacion se reunira dentro de los cinco (5) dias siguientes y estudiara el proyecto presentado".
  2. Segundo. Estese a lo resuelto en la sentencia C-222/96, en cuanto a la palabra "Acusacion", empleada en el art. 341 de la Ley 5a. de 1992 y las expresiones Decision sobre resolucion calificadora", "y decidira si aprueba o no", "Si fuere rechazado designara a un nuevo representante para que elabore la resolucion de acuerdo con lo aceptado por la Comision" del art. 342 la misma ley.
  3. Tercero. INHIBIRSE para pronunciarse de fondo en relacion con el art. 343 de la Ley 5a. de 1992.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.