JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)July 18, 1996Full bench

C-316 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant William Calderon Vargas

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 136/94. Arts. 23 Y 66. Periodo De Sesiones. Causacion De Honorarios De Los Concejos. Exequible Salvo Unas Expresiones.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Concejal
  • Igualdad de honorarios
Municipio
  • Categorías
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 136/94. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 23Ley 136/94UPHELD
Art. 66Ley 136/94UPHELD
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. Estése a lo resuelto en la sentencia C-271/96, mediante la cual se declaró exequible el artículo 23 de la ley 136 de 1994.
  2. SEGUNDO. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el artículo 66 de la ley 136 de 1994, salvo las expresiones "setenta y cinco por ciento (75%) del" y "cincuenta por ciento (50%) del" de su inciso 2o, las cuales se declaran INEXEQUIBLES.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.