JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)March 30, 2004Full bench

C-308 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Marcela Patricia Jimenez Arango

✓
Topic · hard data
Fallo Inhibitorio Por Norma Derogada Tácitamente Que No Se Encuentra Produciendo Efectos Jurídicos
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Inhibicion De La Corte Constitucional
  • Disposición derogada tácitamente que no se encuentran produciendo efectos jurídicos
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Decreto 052 de 1987.

Arts. 30 34 38 y 41 (p).

Estatuto de carrera judicial.

Calificacion de antecedentes.

Ingreso o ascenso en la carrera judicial.

Requisitos minimos para cargos de empleados en la rama judicial y fiscalias.

Inhibida.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 052/87. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 2Decreto 052/87DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 30Decreto 52/87DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 30Decreto 052/87DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 34Decreto 52/87DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 34Decreto 052/87DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 38Decreto 52/87DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 38Decreto 052/87DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 41Decreto 52/87DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 41Decreto 052/87DECLINED TO RULE
9 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Declarare INHIBIDA para pronunciarse sobre la constitucionalidad de los articulos 30 parcial, 34 parcial, 38 y 41 parcial, del Decreto 052 de 1987, por carencia actual de objeto sobre el cual decidir.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.