JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)June 3, 1998Full bench

C-269 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carmenza Isaza de Goméz

✓Claimant Miguel Alvarado Cortes

✓
Topic · hard data
C. De P.C. Art. 379 Parcial. Procedencia Del Recurso Extraordinario De Revision. Excepcion. Inexequible.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Recurso De Revision
  • Procedencia contra sentencias
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 1400/70. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 379Decreto 1400/70STRUCK DOWN
Phrase struck down«inciso final»
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Declárase INEXEQUIBLE el inciso final del artículo 379 del Código de Procedimiento Civil, según el cual " Se exceptúan las sentencias que dicten los jueces municipales en única instancia."
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.