JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)March 24, 1999Full bench

C-189 de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carlos Gaviria Díaz

✓Claimant Jorge Alberto Rojas Otalvaro

✓
Topic · hard data
Dec. 1809/90. Arts. 158 Y 182 Parciales. Arresto De Conductor Embriagado. Inexequibles.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Autoridad Administrativa
  • Privación de la libertad
Norma De Transito
  • Conductores no pueden ser arrestados por infringirlas
  • Conductores pueden ser arrestados por infringirlas
  • Carácter preventivo
Privacion De La Libertad
  • Competencia de autoridades judiciales
Arresto
  • Conductores
Policia Administrativa
  • Función preventiva
8 topics · 9 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 1344/70. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 158Decreto 1344/70STRUCK DOWN
Phrase struck down«arresto de veinticuatro (24) horas»
Art. 182Decreto 1344/70STRUCK DOWN
Phrase struck down«Arresto»
Art. 1Decreto 1809/90STRUCK DOWN· in part
Phrase struck down«reforma 182a»
3 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Declarar INEXEQUIBLES las expresiones "arresto de veinticuatro (24) horas" del numeral 9 del artículo 158ª, y "Arresto" del artículo 182ª, ambos del Decreto 1809 del 6 de agosto de 1990, "por el cual se introducen reformas al Código Nacional de Tránsito Terrestre (Decreto 1344 del 4 de agosto de 1970)".
  2. Notifíquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.