JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)April 10, 1997Full bench

C-186 de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓
Topic · hard data
Dec. 251/97. Por Medio Del Cual Se Modifican Los Dec. 88 Y 150/97. Emergencia Economica. Inexequible.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Inconstitucionalidad Por Consecuencia En Declaracion De Emergencia
  • Modificación decretos y expedición normas complementarias
Inexequibilidad Declaracion De Conmocion Interior
  • Pérdida de vigencia de decretos expedidos
  • Sentencia inhibitoria
  • Sentencia inhibitoria sobre decretos expedidos
Inexequibilidad Declaracion De Emergencia
  • Decisión inhibitoria sobre decretos legislativos posteriores
  • Producción efectos fallos de decretos legislativos
3 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 251/97. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

On the entire provisionDecreto 251/97STRUCK DOWN
On the entire provisionDecreto 080/97STRUCK DOWN
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Declarar INEXEQUIBLE el Decreto Legislativo 251 del 4 de febrero de 1997.
  2. Segundo. La presente decisión surtirá efectos a partir del día siguiente en que se notifique la sentencia C-122 del 12 de marzo de 1997, mediante la cual se decidió la inexequibilidad del Decreto 080 de 1997 que declaró el Estado de Emergencia Económica y Social.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJosé Gregorio Hernández Galindo
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.