JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)April 12, 2011Full bench

C-278 de 2011

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio

✓Claimant Revision De Constitucionalidad·Respondent Decreto 125 De 2011

✓
Topic · hard data
Inconstitucionalidad Por Consecuencia. Programa Especial De Reforestacion En Estado De Emergencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Decreto 125 del 20 de enero del 2011, por el cual se crea el Programa Especial de Reforestación y se dictan otras disposiciones en desarrollo del Decreto 020 de 2011.

Revisión de Constitucionalidad.

Se declara INEXEQUIBLE POR CONSECUENCIA, habida cuenta de que la norma fue expedida en desarrollo del Decreto No. 020 de 2011, declaratorio del estado de emergencia y éste fue declarado inconstitucional en la sentencia C-216/11.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto legislativo 125/11. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

On the entire provisionDecreto legislativo 125/11STRUCK DOWN
Phrase struck down«Por el cual se crea el Programa Especial de Reforestación y se dictan otras disposiciones en desarrollo del Decreto No. 020 de 2011»
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del Pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Declarar INEXEQUIBLE por consecuencia el Decreto Legislativo 125 del 20 de enero de 2011, "Por el cual se crea el Programa Especial de Reforestación y se dictan otras disposiciones en desarrollo del Decreto No. 020 de 2011".
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.