JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)April 15, 1993Full bench

C-136 de 1993

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓
Topic · hard data
Dec. 1875/92. Sanciones A Contratistas. Conmocion Interior. Exequible Salvo Art. 5 Inc. 2
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

6 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 1875/92. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 1Decreto 1875/92UPHELD
Art. 10Decreto 1875/92UPHELD
Art. 2Decreto 1875/92UPHELD
Art. 3Decreto 1875/92UPHELD
Art. 4Decreto 1875/92UPHELD
Art. 5Decreto 1875/92UPHELD
Art. 6Decreto 1875/92UPHELD
Art. 7Decreto 1875/92UPHELD
Art. 8Decreto 1875/92UPHELD
Art. 9Decreto 1875/92UPHELD
10 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. Declarar EXEQUIBLE los siguientes articulos del Decreto Legislativo 1875 de 1992 "Por el cual se dictan normas de Conmocion Interior sobre contratos y sanciones aplicables a los contratistas": 1deg, 2deg, 3deg, 4deg, 6deg, 7deg, 8deg, 9deg y 10deg.
  2. SEGUNDO. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el articulo 5deg del Decreto legislativo 1875 de 1992, salvo el inciso 2o, que dice: "incurrira en causal de mala conducta el funcionario que no declare la caducidad del contrato dentro de los dos dias siguientes a la fecha en que se haya recibido la respectiva solicitud", el cual se declara INEXEQUIBLE.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.