JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)November 28, 2001Full bench

C-1247 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho De Peticion En Pension De Sobrevivientes. Término Para Reconocimiento
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Pension De Sobrevivientes
  • Término perentorio para reconocimiento
  • Finalidad esencial
  • Observancia término de reconocimiento independiente del carácter público o privado
  • Término especial para reconocimiento
5 topics · 7 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Proyecto de ley 155 de 2001 senado y 035 de 2000 camara.

Terminos para el reconocimiento de la pension de sobrevivientes por parte de la entidad de prevision social correspondiente.

Dos meses.

Proteccion a la familia como nucleo esencial de la sociedad.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 155/01. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

On the entire provisionLey 155/01UPHELD
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Declarar INFUNDADAS las objeciones presentadas al Proyecto de Ley 155/01 Senado 035/00 Camara "Por la cual se establecen terminos para el reconocimiento de las pensiones de sobrevivientes y se dictan otras disposiciones". En consecuencia, por los aspectos analizados declarase EXEQUIBLE el mencionado proyecto de ley.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.