JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)November 11, 2003Full bench

C-1059 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 789 De 2002. Art.43. Aportes A La Seguridad Social.Derecho A La Propiedad De Las Eps. Prestacion De Servicios Hasta Por 6 Meses A Pesar De No Recibir Aportes De Empleadores Que Los Han Descontado A Sus Empleados.Estarse A Lo Resuelto <a Href=../2003/C
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Cosa Juzgada Constitucional
  • Fundamento
  • Supuesta vulneración del principio de unidad de materia
Inhibicion De La Corte Constitucional
  • Cargo no se predica de disposición acusada
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 789/02. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 43Ley 789/02DECLINED TO RULE
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. R E S U E L V E:
  3. Primero. ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la sentencia C-800 de 2003, en relacion con el cargo por la supuesta vulneracion del principio de unidad de materia por el articulo 43 de la Ley 789 de 2002.
  4. Segundo. INHIBIRSE de efectuar pronunciamiento de fondo en relacion con los demas cargos planteados en la demanda contra el articulo 43 de la ley 789 de 2002 por ineptitud sustancial de la misma.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.