JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)February 4, 2003Full bench

C-068 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Augusto Gutierrez Arias Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Decreto 1278 De 2002. Art. 67. Estatuto De Profesionalizacion Docente. Personal Administrativo De Establecimientos Educativos Estatales. Regulacion Por Normas De Carrera Administrativa. Ley 443 De 1998. Facultades Extraordinarias. Ley 715 De 2001. Exequib
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Estatuto De Profesionalizacion Docente
  • Clases de servidores públicos
Principio De Unidad De Materia En Estatuto De Profesionalizacion Docente
  • Clases de servidores de que se ocupa
  • Personal administrativo de establecimiento educativo estatal
Acto Legislativo De Sistema General De Participaciones
  • Presentación anticipada de proyecto de ley de regulación resulta inconstitucional
Acto Legislativo
  • Vigencia anticipada de ley de desarrollo
Facultades Extraordinarias Para Estatuto De Profesionalizacion Docente
  • Nuevo régimen de carrera de docentes, directivos docentes y administrativos
7 topics · 8 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 1278/02. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 67Decreto 1278/02UPHELD
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE :
  3. Declarar exequible el artículo 67 del Decreto 1278 de 2002 "por el cual se expide el Estatuto de Profesionalización Docente", sólo por el cargo estudiado.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.