JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)February 15, 1996Full bench

C-057 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Hernando Herrera Vergara

✓Claimant Luis Antonio Vargas Alvarez

✓
Topic · hard data
Dec. 574/95. Arts. 910 Y 11. Retiro Del Servicio De La Policia Nacional. Exequible E Inexequible. Estarse A Lo Resuelto En La <a Href=../1995/C-525-95.Rtf> C-525/95</A>.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 574/95. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 1Decreto 574/95STRUCK DOWN
Art. 10Decreto 574/95STRUCK DOWN
Art. 11Decreto 574/95ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 11Decreto 574/95STRUCK DOWN
Art. 11Decreto 574/95STRUCK DOWN
Art. 6Decreto 574/95STRUCK DOWN
Art. 9Decreto 574/95UPHELD
7 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. PRIMERO. ESTESE A LO RESUELTO en la sentencia No. C-525 de noviembre 16 de 1995 que declaró EXEQUIBLE el artículo 11 del Decreto 574 de 1995, "por el cual se modifica parcialmente el Decreto 262 de 31 de enero de 1994, normas de carrera del personal de agentes de la Policía Nacional".
  4. SEGUNDO. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el artículo 9o. del Decreto 574 de 1995, "por el cual se modifica parcialmente el Decreto 262 de 31 de enero de 1994, normas de carrera del personal de agentes de la Policía Nacional".
  5. TERCERO. Declarar INEXEQUIBLES el inciso 2o del parágrafo 2o del artículo 1o y el literal e) del numeral 2o del artículo 6o, así como el artículo 10 del Decreto 574 de 1995, "por el cual se modifica parcialmente el Decreto 262 de 31 de enero de 1994, normas de carrera del personal de agentes de la Policía Nacional".
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.