JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)February 16, 1995Full bench

C-053 de 1995

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz

✓Claimant Maximiliano Echeverry Marulanda

✓
Topic · hard data
Dec. 663/93. Art. 322 N° 3. Estatuto Organico Del Sistema Financiero. Reserva De Informacion Financiera. Fogafin. Exequible.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 663/93. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 322Decreto 663/93STRUCK DOWN
Phrase struck down«numeral 3»
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Corte Constitucional
  2. R E S U E L V E:
  3. PRIMERO. DECLARAR INEXEQUIBLE el aparte del articulo 322 numeral 3o del Decreto 663 de 1993 que dice "En general, el fondo gozara de reserva sobre sus papeles, libros y correspondencia".
  4. SEGUNDO. DECLARAR EXEQUIBLE el aparte del articulo 322 numeral 3o del Decreto 663 de 1993 que dice "Reserva de informacion. El Fondo de Garantias de Instituciones Financieras estara obligado a guardar reserva sobre las informaciones que exija a las instituciones financieras inscritas, salvo en los casos previstos en la Constitucion y en la ley", bajo el entendido de que dicha reserva versa unicamente sobre informaciones que por su naturaleza material conciernen unicamente a la institucion financiera en particular y, ademas, carecen de relevancia financiera externa y se encuentran por fuera de los mandatos legales de divulgacion publica.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.